fluent.com home page

   
 

Flameless Burner Validation

 

Daniele Tabacco and Claudio Bruno, University of Rome La Sapienza - Department of Mechanics and Aeronautics, Rome, Italy; and Giorgio Calchetti and Marco Rufoloni, Italian National Agency for New Technology, Energy, and the Environment (ENEA), Rome, Italy

View Larger Image
The 3D hybrid mesh used for all simulations

Researchers at the Combustion Technology Section of ENEA (Research Center La Casaccia) in Rome recently validated FLUENT through a series of simulations of the WS Rekumat C-150 B burner. Operation of the 40 kW burner is based on flameless combustion technology1 , which gives rise to high process efficiency with low pollutant emissions. While the burner is designed to operate in either conventional flame or diluted combustion (flameless) modes, only the latter was the subject of the present studies. Measurements were made for three sets of operating conditions, corresponding to process temperatures of 950, 1050, and 1150 K. These were compared to results predicted by FLUENT for the corresponding conditions.

View Larger Image
The measured temperatures for the 1050 K reference temperature case
View Larger Image
The temperatures predicted by FLUENT for the 1050 K reference temperature case, using the one-step Magnussen model

In FLUENT, two different combustion modeling approaches were tested: the mixture fraction/pdf method, using an equilibrium assumption, and the Magnussen, or finite rate/eddy dissipation method, using a one-step reaction mechanism. For both sets of simulations, NOx prediction was performed. The realizable k-e turbulence model was chosen to give the most accuracy for the least amount of CPU effort, based on earlier benchmark tests performed for similar conditions. Radiation was incorporated through the use of the discrete ordinates (DO) model.

Both the pdf and Magnussen models gave good qualitative agreement with the experimental data, with the Magnussen model outperforming the pdf model in its prediction of centerline temperatures for the low and moderate process temperature cases. This result suggests that at these temperatures, the diluted combustion is controlled more by kinetics than by turbulent mixing. The equilibrium assumption at the core of the pdf model fails to accurately predict the ignition delay in this regime.

At the highest process temperature, the ignition delay is reduced. The Magnussen model overpredicts the delay as well as the maximum temperature. The pdf model, on the other hand, comes closer to predicting the overall temperature field, even though the maximum temperature is again higher than that suggested by the measurements. This result suggests that turbulent fluctuations in the local temperature and mixture fraction, which are better handled by the statistical methods of the pdf model, play a more important role in this regime of operation. Temperature fluctuations were found to play a significant role in thermal and prompt NOx production at the higher temperature, as well.

Reference :

1 Wunning, J. A., and Wunning, J. G., Burners for Flameless Oxidation with Low-Nox Formation Even at Maximum Preheat, Journal of the Institute of Energy 65, 35-40, 1992.


Previous ArticleFluentNEWS Next Article