| |
By H. Vahedi Tafreshi and B. Pourdeyhimi, Nonwovens Cooperative Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
View the pdf of this article
An unsteady simulation of a sharp-edged
orifice (r/d = 0.01, where r is the inlet
radius of curvature and d the inlet diameter)
conducting a waterjet under high pressure
(150 bar) has been performed to examine
the onset and evolution of cavitation clouds
inside a nozzle. Using FLUENT, the simulation
showed that if the pressure is high enough
and the inlet edge sufficiently sharp, the cavitation
cloud grows and reaches the nozzle
outlet. As the cloud reaches the outlet, the
downstream ambient air finds a way to flow
into the nozzle, resulting in a so-called hydraulic
flip. Once the hydraulic flip condition
occurs, cavitation immediately stops because the cloud region becomes filled with air, separating
the waterjet from the nozzle wall. This
effect keeps the waterjet surface from cavitation-
and friction-induced instabilities.
Constricted waterjets, enveloped by air inside
a nozzle, stay intact for a significantly greater
distance than non-constricted jets1. These waterjets
have diverse applications, including nonwoven
fabric manufacturing via a process called
hydroentangling. This process is used for
mechanically bonding a web of loose fibers
to form uniform entangled sheets of fibers1.
The impact of the waterjets with the fibers
displaces and rotates them with respect to
their neighbors. During these relative displacements,
some of the fibers twist and entangle
around others and inter-lock with them
through fiber-to-fiber friction.

Contours of stream function at 26 ms show the presence of
cavitation
The cavitation model in FLUENT 6 was used
for a 17,000-cell axisymmetric simulation of
flow through a sharp-edged nozzle. The cavitation
model tracks two interpenetrating
fluids (liquid and vapor) using a volume fraction
equation and a single momentum equation.
Bubbles form when the local pressure
becomes less than the vaporization pressure,
and these bubbles may grow and form
cavities. Pressure inlet and pressure outlet boundary
conditions were used along with the RNG
k-e turbulence model. The two-layer zonal
method was used for the wall treatment, with
y+ values close to unity in the cells adjacent
to the solid surface.
For the cavitation simulation, the bubble
number density (BND) should be known in
advance. Acquiring such information is difficult
because it requires sophisticated experimental facilities. Instead, a minimum
BND that results in the occurrence of a hydraulic
flip was determined and used in the simulation.
To determine the value, a series of simulations
were run with different BND values.
Starting from a low value, the BND was gradually
increased until the hydraulic flip
occurred. The final value (6x109 bubbles/m3)
was in agreement with a range of values (108
to 1012 bubbles/m3) reported in the literature2.
(Any value greater than 6x109 bubbles/m3
would cause the hydraulic flip to occur as
well.) To simplify the problem, the pressure
outlet was set up with a vapor (rather than
air) volume fraction of unity. This means that
any backflow through the outlet enters the
calculation domain in the form of vapor rather
than air. This approximation is valid since the
densities of vapor and air are similar when
compared to that of liquid water.
The CFD simulations were very successful
in predicting the hydraulic flip. The
discharge coefficient obtained from the simulation,
Cd = 0.63, defined as the ratio of the
actual flow rate from a nozzle to that calculated
by inviscid one-dimensional theory (the
Bernoulli equation), was found to be
in excellent agreement with experimental
data.




Contours of mixture density inside the nozzle after 10, 30, 50, and 60 ms of operation
References:
- H. Vahedi Tafreshi and B. Pourdeyhimi,
Experiments in Fluids, 35(4), pp.364-371, 2003.
- R.A. Bunnell, S.D. Heister, C. Yen, and S.H.
Collicott, Atomization and Sprays, 9,
pp.445-465, 1999.
- H. Vahedi Tafreshi and B. Pourdeyhimi, Textile
Research Journal, 74(4), 2004.
|
|
|